Message boards :
Cafe :
Grand Unification
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 12 Sep 14 Posts: 1064 Credit: 328,312 RAC: 176 |
Now that we are able to control both which applications can be run and how many tasks are assigned per host, is there any need to have both LHC@home and vLHC@home or can we combine them? The main argument for vLHC@home was to not force virtualized tasks onto volunteers. Since we now know how to specify default applications, virtualized applications could be opt-in so we could have the same behaviour in a single project. The advantage would be one username/password etc., a single forum and less confusion. What is the general consensus? |
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 15 Posts: 62 Credit: 296,695 RAC: 0 |
That's OK for me. I have 2 SixTrack tasks running in this project. Tullio |
Send message Joined: 19 Aug 15 Posts: 46 Credit: 3,564,660 RAC: 171 |
I let SixTrack run full utilization and prioritize over other project as it bursty. if merged would it be more consistent? As with other project changes I can imagine people would like there credit migrated |
©2024 CERN