New Version v47.70

Author	Message
Laurence Project administrator Project developer Project tester Send message Joined: 12 Sep 14 Posts: 1069 Credit: 334,882 RAC: 0	Message 4265 - Posted: 31 Oct 2016, 12:29:39 UTC Last modified: 31 Oct 2016, 12:29:58 UTC This new version address the Dirty Cow Vulnerability. ID: 4265 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

computezrmle Volunteer moderator Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Help desk expert Send message Joined: 28 Jul 16 Posts: 484 Credit: 394,839 RAC: 0	Message 4266 - Posted: 31 Oct 2016, 13:20:39 UTC Some things work, others don´t. What works: App update to v47.70 (I reattached via the old HTTP page a while back) RAM calculation (partly: VM started using 3 GB) VM gets a CMS job What does not work: core setting (VM started with 1 instead of 3) RAM setting (I expected a higher RAM usage according to the preferences) Is there a statement regarding the RAM calculation? Why was it necessary to create a new version? According to the post from Ben Segal the VMs should get an update "automagically" when they reboot. ID: 4266 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Crystal Pellet Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 13 Feb 15 Posts: 1188 Credit: 862,257 RAC: 25	Message 4267 - Posted: 31 Oct 2016, 13:49:54 UTC Using the new https URL I still get the old CMS Simulation v47.40 version in stead of v47.70. ID: 4267 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

computezrmle Volunteer moderator Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Help desk expert Send message Joined: 28 Jul 16 Posts: 484 Credit: 394,839 RAC: 0	Message 4268 - Posted: 31 Oct 2016, 13:59:24 UTC - in response to Message 4267. Using the new https URL I still get the old CMS Simulation v47.40 version in stead of v47.70. This supports my suspicion: new HTTPS URL -> outdated app version old HTTP URL -> most recent app version ID: 4268 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Laurence Project administrator Project developer Project tester Send message Joined: 12 Sep 14 Posts: 1069 Credit: 334,882 RAC: 0	Message 4270 - Posted: 2 Nov 2016, 11:31:30 UTC - in response to Message 4266. Is there a statement regarding the RAM calculation? It looks like our understanding was in correct and the base memory should have been 1GB. The additional 1GB per core was guestimate and feedback can help optimize this setting. Why was it necessary to create a new version? According to the post from Ben Segal the VMs should get an update "automagically" when they reboot. We were advised to roll out new images as the kernel is not automatically updated. ID: 4270 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Rasputin42 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 16 Aug 15 Posts: 966 Credit: 1,211,816 RAC: 0	Message 4271 - Posted: 2 Nov 2016, 12:35:14 UTC Last modified: 2 Nov 2016, 12:43:15 UTC I have had 4 tasks running on single core each successfully with 1664MB allocated per task. My suggestion is 1 GB base plus 896M per core. Other suggestions? ID: 4271 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Laurence Project administrator Project developer Project tester Send message Joined: 12 Sep 14 Posts: 1069 Credit: 334,882 RAC: 0	Message 4272 - Posted: 2 Nov 2016, 15:25:18 UTC - in response to Message 4271. My suggestion is 1 GB base plus 896M per core. The configuration has been updated to these values. ID: 4272 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Rasputin42 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 16 Aug 15 Posts: 966 Credit: 1,211,816 RAC: 0	Message 4273 - Posted: 2 Nov 2016, 16:41:36 UTC Ok, we will see, how that works. However, the bug, that any CMS-task will only run on a s1ngle core, no matter what the settings in the preferences are,still exists. It would be nice, if that could be fixed. ID: 4273 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

computezrmle Volunteer moderator Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Help desk expert Send message Joined: 28 Jul 16 Posts: 484 Credit: 394,839 RAC: 0	Message 4281 - Posted: 4 Nov 2016, 9:34:08 UTC When a 3core VM initially starts it gets only 2 jobs. The 3rd core remains idle for about 20 minutes. Then the VM requests a 3rd job. Why not at startup? ID: 4281 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Magic Quantum Mechanic Send message Joined: 8 Apr 15 Posts: 781 Credit: 12,422,653 RAC: 3,337	Message 4287 - Posted: 6 Nov 2016, 11:25:00 UTC - in response to Message 4265. Got one of these after running 15,000 seconds aka 4 hours 23 min 5 sec http://lhcathomedev.cern.ch/vLHCathome-dev/result.php?resultid=283165 Screen Shot Information (Base64 Encoded PNG): MD5 Signature: cadd404e274741b69513b8eda5344d94 Data: (I will not post a copy of that last line since it is a couple miles long so take a look) Mad Scientist For Life ID: 4287 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

[AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome_C2005 Send message Joined: 17 Mar 15 Posts: 51 Credit: 602,329 RAC: 0	Message 4288 - Posted: 6 Nov 2016, 11:38:41 UTC Last modified: 6 Nov 2016, 11:40:34 UTC These do not fail anymore on my Mac. Except 1, so far 6 OK (from 01/11 and yesterday) and 1 KO (error 206 on the 03/11). ID: 4288 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

ivan Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 20 Jan 15 Posts: 1139 Credit: 8,310,612 RAC: 123	Message 4289 - Posted: 6 Nov 2016, 11:45:43 UTC - in response to Message 4287. Has anyone decoded that image? I tried with an on-line site and got mainly garbage. ID: 4289 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Development for LHC@home