New version v3.10

Author	Message
Laurence Project administrator Project developer Project tester Send message Joined: 12 Sep 14 Posts: 1067 Credit: 329,397 RAC: 234	Message 5524 - Posted: 15 Sep 2018, 22:37:05 UTC Uses OpenHTC.io for CernVM ID: 5524 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

maeax Send message Joined: 22 Apr 16 Posts: 667 Credit: 1,807,614 RAC: 2,394	Message 5526 - Posted: 17 Sep 2018, 5:21:31 UTC Three Theory on two PC's have finished successful. ID: 5526 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

gyllic Send message Joined: 10 Mar 17 Posts: 40 Credit: 108,345 RAC: 0	Message 5532 - Posted: 21 Sep 2018, 12:22:40 UTC - in response to Message 5524. Uses OpenHTC.io for CernVM Maybe I am overlooking something obvious, but how can you verify that the VM really uses OpenHTC.io for CernVM? "Just" a successfull run does not directly indicate that openthc was used for CernVM, or does it? ID: 5532 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

computezrmle Volunteer moderator Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Help desk expert Send message Joined: 28 Jul 16 Posts: 475 Credit: 389,411 RAC: 28	Message 5533 - Posted: 21 Sep 2018, 13:16:34 UTC - in response to Message 5532. ... how can you verify that the VM really uses OpenHTC.io for CernVM? ... Laurence configured the VM's CVMFS using this line (or similar): CVMFS_SERVER_URL="http://s1cern-cvmfs.openhtc.io/cvmfs/@fqrn@;http://s1ral-cvmfs.openhtc.io/cvmfs/@fqrn@;http://s1bnl-cvmfs.openhtc.io/cvmfs/@fqrn@;http://s1fnal-cvmfs.openhtc.io/cvmfs/@fqrn@" As long as there is no other config file with higher priority that overwrites this setting, what other servers should CVMFS use? In addition you may check your network traffic. ID: 5533 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

m Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 20 Mar 15 Posts: 243 Credit: 886,442 RAC: 223	Message 5534 - Posted: 22 Sep 2018, 10:25:39 UTC - in response to Message 5533. Last modified: 22 Sep 2018, 10:58:32 UTC ... how can you verify that the VM really uses OpenHTC.io for CernVM? ... ... you may check your network traffic. From the local proxy log:- a host running dev theory 22/09/2018 01:15:27 2 192.168.100.122 TCP_MEM_HIT/200 1080 GET http://s1ral-cvmfs.openhtc.io/cvmfs/grid.cern.ch/.cvmfspublished - NONE/- application/x-cvmfs 22/09/2018 01:15:45 2 192.168.100.122 TCP_MEM_HIT/200 1087 GET http://s1cern-cvmfs.openhtc.io/cvmfs/cvmfs-config.cern.ch/.cvmfspublished - NONE/- application/x-cvmfs 22/09/2018 01:16:28 70 192.168.100.122 TCP_MISS/200 1219 GET http://s1cern-cvmfs.openhtc.io/cvmfs/cvmfs-config.cern.ch/.cvmfspublished - DIRECT/104.18.55.33 application/x-cvmfs 22/09/2018 01:16:32 26 192.168.100.122 TCP_MISS/200 1214 GET http://s1cern-cvmfs.openhtc.io/cvmfs/grid.cern.ch/.cvmfspublished - DIRECT/104.18.55.33 application/x-cvmfs and from one running production theory 22/09/2018 01:16:38 60 192.168.100.123 TCP_MISS/200 618 GET http://s1cern-cvmfs.openhtc.io/cvmfs/sft.cern.ch/api/v1.0/geo/192.168.100.137/s1bnl-cvmfs.openhtc.io,s1cern-cvmfs.openhtc.io,s1fnal-cvmfs.openhtc.io,s1ral-cvmfs.openhtc.io - DIRECT/104.18.55.33 text/plain 22/09/2018 01:16:53 18 192.168.100.123 TCP_MEM_HIT/200 98178 GET http://s1ral-cvmfs.openhtc.io/cvmfs/sft.cern.ch/data/d1/9d8bd664ae174d4eab80c023f7efb48ef9f495C - NONE/- text/plain 22/09/2018 01:16:53 12 192.168.100.123 TCP_MEM_HIT/200 61402 GET http://s1ral-cvmfs.openhtc.io/cvmfs/sft.cern.ch/data/71/948c137be8baa03f6a6fb4b3bf8042ab8d161bC - NONE/- text/plain 22/09/2018 01:16:55 389 192.168.100.123 TCP_HIT/200 1754447 GET http://s1ral-cvmfs.openhtc.io/cvmfs/sft.cern.ch/data/69/9c932053df383da6b67605d31b84c417915baa - NONE/- text/plain 22/09/2018 01:16:55 3 192.168.100.123 TCP_MEM_HIT/200 6521 GET http://s1ral-cvmfs.openhtc.io/cvmfs/sft.cern.ch/data/75/a4e5370a790c6e4668a765f522e3d1387ff35a - NONE/- text/plain so it really does work, unfortunately. From what I see here it has removed most of the advantage of the local proxy. ID: 5534 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Development for LHC@home