Message boards : Number crunching : VirtualBox 6.0.2
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 8 Apr 15 Posts: 786 Credit: 12,818,273 RAC: 11,234 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Anyone try the new version yet? |
Send message Joined: 22 Apr 16 Posts: 677 Credit: 2,002,766 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
No, 5.2.22 is active by Oracle and running well. Since 19/1/15 Virtualbox 5.2.24 is also avalaible. |
Send message Joined: 13 Feb 15 Posts: 1188 Credit: 877,474 RAC: 68 ![]() ![]() |
Yes, I ran a few nanohub-tasks with it. That's an alpha-project using VM, but the tasks often have wrong time- or disk limits, so many errors not caused by the VM. The valid tasks: https://boinc.nanohub.org/nanoHUB_at_home/results.php?hostid=81&offset=0&show_names=0&state=4&appid= I'll start a Theory with VBox 6.0.2 here at dev. |
Send message Joined: 13 Feb 15 Posts: 1188 Credit: 877,474 RAC: 68 ![]() ![]() |
I'll start a Theory with VBox 6.0.2 here at dev.The task is running OK. Suspended the task, where the state was saved to a snapshot file and resumed after a while. The UI of VirtualBox Manager has improved. You directly see in what slot the VM is running and also have directly access to the VBox.log files and the VBoxHardening.log. The result is https://lhcathomedev.cern.ch/lhcathome-dev/result.php?resultid=2748267, but still in progress. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 8 Apr 15 Posts: 786 Credit: 12,818,273 RAC: 11,234 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks CP I see that first one was the short version ( I have had many of those) Run time 1 hours 25 min 11 sec CPU time 1 hours 16 min 41 sec But I see you have another one running and it is at close to 6.5 hours so far.......the main thing is that it appears to work here. |
Send message Joined: 10 Mar 17 Posts: 40 Credit: 108,345 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
i have run a theory task over at the production site with VBox 6.0.0 and it worked without any problem. Currently some tasks with VBox 6.0.2 are running and are looking good so far. Didnt try to pause and resume the tasks though. |
©2025 CERN