Message boards :
Sixtrack Application :
Xtrack beam simulation
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 20 Jun 16 Posts: 20 Credit: 1,590,603 RAC: 62  
|
I have an Xtrack beam simulation that doesn't want to go home. Been running status for almost 6 days but has nothing left to do... only sit there and run. deadline was 3/9. Should I just blow it up or what? on the DEV site, only 1 is left and guess who's it is? |
|
Send message Joined: 24 Oct 19 Posts: 154 Credit: 341,141 RAC: 543  
|
I have an Xtrack beam simulation that doesn't want to go home. Been running status for almost 6 days but has nothing left to do... only sit there and run. deadline was 3/9. Same here. The beaviour is strange: very fast to arrive to 99,99% (less than 30 minutes), now it's at 100% running after 8hrs. Can we have to abort these wus?? P.S. Again, please open a forum's section for Xtrack |
|
Send message Joined: 24 Oct 19 Posts: 154 Credit: 341,141 RAC: 543
|
The beaviour is strange: very fast to arrive to 99,99% (less than 30 minutes), now it's at 100% running after 8hrs. After over 20hrs of crunching i needed to reboot my pc (wu is still running at 100%). The wu restarted from 95% and quickly arrived at 99,99% Still running.... |
|
Send message Joined: 24 Oct 19 Posts: 154 Credit: 341,141 RAC: 543
|
After over 20hrs of crunching i needed to reboot my pc (wu is still running at 100%). After others 4hrs running at 100%, i killed these wus |
|
Send message Joined: 19 Aug 15 Posts: 46 Credit: 3,565,301 RAC: 172
|
Didn't change too much, I got one today that's 100 % after 3 h, so there estimated task size seems in correct? |
 Send message Joined: 23 Mar 21 Posts: 1 Credit: 527,675 RAC: 370 
|
i've had a bunch complete and validate some at ~1s, some at ~1000s, some at ~86400s leaving the remainder to complete |
|
Send message Joined: 19 Aug 15 Posts: 46 Credit: 3,565,301 RAC: 172
|
completed after about 2 day |
 Magic Quantum Mechanic Send message Joined: 8 Apr 15 Posts: 751 Credit: 11,610,376 RAC: 1,406 
|
I finally got 4 of them and was wondering if they were going to work on Windows 11 since the run time says less than an hour but yours looks good Toby so I will let mine keep running since it is just 4 extra threads I have on a 16 thread machine I use mainly for Einstein GPU's Here is yours for almost 40 hours https://lhcathomedev.cern.ch/lhcathome-dev/result.php?resultid=3218544 Mad Scientist For Life |
|
Magic Quantum Mechanic Send message Joined: 8 Apr 15 Posts: 751 Credit: 11,610,376 RAC: 1,406
|
Well maybe not.......just noticed that complete task got zero Credits |
|
Send message Joined: 18 Sep 16 Posts: 17 Credit: 707,698 RAC: 435
|
completed after about 2 day Did the tasks jump to 100% at about 1.5 minutes and then finally finish after 2 days? Because I have been aborting tasks after 10 hours after they get to 100% after about 1.5 minutes. |
|
Magic Quantum Mechanic Send message Joined: 8 Apr 15 Posts: 751 Credit: 11,610,376 RAC: 1,406
|
I am pretty sure they jump to 100% after around 3 hours and then run to 40 hours before turning them in Valid but on Windows give you 0 credits. But I will know for sure tonight since I have 4 running that way on a Win 11 host It did call that one "Validate state Initial" with 0 credit after 40 hours. ( I am pretty sure it just said Valid the first time I looked) Mine are at 24hrs right now. |
|
Magic Quantum Mechanic Send message Joined: 8 Apr 15 Posts: 751 Credit: 11,610,376 RAC: 1,406
|
Well I just got home for a Xtrack surprise Run time 1 days 5 hours 9 min 46 sec X 4 and all Valid with Credits I will try another batch if the server gives me any. https://lhcathomedev.cern.ch/lhcathome-dev/result.php?resultid=3218930 |
|
Send message Joined: 18 Sep 16 Posts: 17 Credit: 707,698 RAC: 435
|
Well I just got home for a Xtrack surprise You are 4 at a time or 4 cpu cores per task? I am running them 1 cpu core per task and 4 tasks at one time on this 16 core pc. |
|
Magic Quantum Mechanic Send message Joined: 8 Apr 15 Posts: 751 Credit: 11,610,376 RAC: 1,406
|
I ran the 4 single core version tasks Wish I would have got more to run since as usual there are none left so since this is on my 16 thread host I already changed the setting to get no limit and single core. |
|
Send message Joined: 18 Sep 16 Posts: 17 Credit: 707,698 RAC: 435
|
I ran the 4 single core version tasks Okay thanks |
|
Send message Joined: 18 Sep 16 Posts: 17 Credit: 707,698 RAC: 435
|
Well I just got home for a Xtrack surprise I just finished a batch on one pc with each task taking 220K+ seconds each, and EVERY task validated!!! Now my wingman did the same task in ALOT less time but my pc is SLOW BUT they ARE validating if I just let them run!!! |
|
Send message Joined: 19 Aug 15 Posts: 46 Credit: 3,565,301 RAC: 172
|
yes, it was really fast to 100 % then took ages to finish. waiting for wingman now |
|
Send message Joined: 31 Jul 22 Posts: 11 Credit: 3,539,077 RAC: 10,800   
|
I have an Xtrack ddicroce_test_test_3 task running right now on my Ryzen 9 3900X and it is currently at 7.25 days (626K seconds) of run time. it has been showing 100% progress for about two days now and is still running... Edit: I just checked, and in fact it has been running so long that the server marked that task as failed because the result has not been reported yet. https://lhcathomedev.cern.ch/lhcathome-dev/result.php?resultid=3218179 |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Mar 15 Posts: 51 Credit: 602,329 RAC: 0
|
https://lhcathomedev.cern.ch/lhcathome-dev/result.php?resultid=3218843 Fascinating : Temps de fonctionnement 1 jours 9 heures 5 min 47 sec :D :D :D OK, OK, 3 of them finally terminated with similar duration by awarding 1k-1,5k credits, but that one is my record :) |
|
Send message Joined: 18 Sep 16 Posts: 17 Credit: 707,698 RAC: 435
|
I have an Xtrack ddicroce_test_test_3 task running right now on my Ryzen 9 3900X and it is currently at 7.25 days (626K seconds) of run time. it has been showing 100% progress for about two days now and is still running... I'm seeing that too, no time to finish the tasks because the time estimates are soooo far off and the Server is just cancelling them, some while they are still running |
©2024 CERN