Message boards :
Sixtrack Application :
Xtrack beam simulation
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 8 Apr 15 Posts: 781 Credit: 12,422,653 RAC: 3,337 |
That is about right since the run time and CPU time are around 33 hours. As far as them running at 100% that is how the tend to run but I wouldn't let one run like that for over 45 hours total. I would abort if they did that and last time I got some to run I watched the CPU to see if it even seemed to be doing anything. So far that worked BUT I haven't been able to get any more since I only got 4 and then all the rest were taken......which is too bad since I run them as fast as possible and turn them in so we don't have to wait for weeks. But I did see a strange one that ran for 19 hours and got 1.27 Credit |
Send message Joined: 24 Oct 19 Posts: 171 Credit: 543,238 RAC: 245 |
They released, yesterday, a new version of Xboinc (0.03) I don't know if this version will be released here in test to solve some problems.... |
Send message Joined: 8 Apr 15 Posts: 781 Credit: 12,422,653 RAC: 3,337 |
It looks like Freddie is working on that and I hope we get some to run here soon. |
Send message Joined: 24 Oct 19 Posts: 171 Credit: 543,238 RAC: 245 |
It looks like Freddie is working on that and I hope we get some to run here soon. They don't seem to be in a hurry :-P |
Send message Joined: 8 Apr 15 Posts: 781 Credit: 12,422,653 RAC: 3,337 |
Yeah you would think this is December again or they forgot we are here waiting every day. Mad Scientist For Life |
Send message Joined: 24 Oct 19 Posts: 171 Credit: 543,238 RAC: 245 |
They released, yesterday, a new version of Xboinc (0.0.3) The new version of Xboinc is 0.1.2 Waiting for some new wus here... |
Send message Joined: 24 Oct 19 Posts: 171 Credit: 543,238 RAC: 245 |
The new version of Xboinc is 0.1.2 And 0.1.3 is ready: - Important bugfix in executable - Added tests |
Send message Joined: 24 Oct 19 Posts: 171 Credit: 543,238 RAC: 245 |
Version 0.11 is the first. 1 year ago... We are still waiting :-P |
Send message Joined: 24 Oct 19 Posts: 171 Credit: 543,238 RAC: 245 |
And 0.1.3 is ready Now the version is 0.1.5
|
Send message Joined: 13 Feb 15 Posts: 1188 Credit: 862,257 RAC: 25 |
Another bunch of test tasks are sent to us volunteers without any communication. I suppose this time the tasks are coming from researcher Frederik Van der Veken. The tasks however are useless to test, because they all don't really start and all crash within a few seconds with too many exits. |
Send message Joined: 20 Jun 17 Posts: 25 Credit: 5,472,506 RAC: 610 |
I received 1 on a PC hat has been running for 17 hours. Another PC received several that error'd immediately with segmentation violation. All while someones been running 3 tasks since Nov per WUProp hour data. Edit: Now the PC with 17 hour task received some more but all failed: <core_client_version>7.16.6</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 193 (0xc1, -63)</message> <stderr_txt> SIGSEGV: segmentation violation Stack trace (8 frames): [0x42f3c0] [0x44b5b0] [0x408b46] [0x40900e] [0x429157] [0x429e7f] [0x4cd58e] [0x402265] Exiting... </stderr_txt> ]]> |
Send message Joined: 19 Aug 15 Posts: 46 Credit: 3,626,553 RAC: 16 |
Same for me mostly segmetation fault. There was one good one, almost <core_client_version>7.24.1</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> 2024-01-12 18:06:25 (5864): called boinc_finish(0) </stderr_txt> <message> upload failure: <file_xfer_error> <file_name>fvanderv__fulltest1__job0__O457o6glrgwX_1_r1723837928_result</file_name> <error_code>-161 (not found)</error_code> </file_xfer_error> </message> ]]> |
Send message Joined: 8 Apr 15 Posts: 781 Credit: 12,422,653 RAC: 3,337 |
Server says we have some but all I got one and it didn't do anything 10 hours ago |
Send message Joined: 22 Aug 22 Posts: 22 Credit: 63,680 RAC: 0 |
I got some but all of them segfaulted on my vmware vm. https://lhcathomedev.cern.ch/lhcathome-dev/result.php?resultid=3289937 |
Send message Joined: 24 Oct 19 Posts: 171 Credit: 543,238 RAC: 245 |
I got some but all of them segfaulted on my vmware vm. But there are valid wus?? I read only errors.... |
Send message Joined: 24 Oct 19 Posts: 171 Credit: 543,238 RAC: 245 |
At the end, i can attach a linux machine to lhc-dev to test Xtrack Obviously all errors on my Mint 20 pc <message> |
Send message Joined: 24 Oct 19 Posts: 171 Credit: 543,238 RAC: 245 |
Still all errors Please, stop this batch and fix the problem |
Send message Joined: 24 Oct 19 Posts: 171 Credit: 543,238 RAC: 245 |
Please, stop this batch and fix the problem Seems they are working on the code. Waiting for a new app and a new batch of wus |
Send message Joined: 8 Apr 15 Posts: 781 Credit: 12,422,653 RAC: 3,337 |
Since last June when we had the ones that seemed to work I wondered why those aren't good enough to run doing those or why they just appeared to be Valids and didn't do what we want them to do. (without digging around github) Wouldn't mind some CMS here to run too.......since for another mysterious reason mine have no problems with CMS but crash in 24 seconds with Theory now (here and over at prod.) I even tried to reset the project and d/l it again a few times.....but I will figure it out eventually yes I know this is a different thread but we are all regulars here so I never have a problem with that Only good thing is most of my GPU's are busy at Einstein for the next 2 months but I do have some ready here for the Xtrack 24/7 (Hi Axel) |
Send message Joined: 22 Apr 16 Posts: 677 Credit: 2,002,766 RAC: 0 |
Yes Magic, some time seeing -dev what's going on. But, this is not so much. Theory is something for Laurence, if he have time. Atlas went also wrong for me two days ago. Now it's running again. And E@H like, we want to see it as volunteers. |
©2024 CERN