We have results!

Author	Message
ivan Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 20 Jan 15 Posts: 1139 Credit: 8,310,612 RAC: 728	Message 579 - Posted: 15 Aug 2015, 0:17:16 UTC First CMS@Home results returned to storage! (Don't try to look at the page yourself, unless you have CMS credentials.) ID: 579 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

ivan Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 20 Jan 15 Posts: 1139 Credit: 8,310,612 RAC: 728	Message 580 - Posted: 15 Aug 2015, 0:24:31 UTC - in response to Message 579. Last modified: 15 Aug 2015, 0:40:35 UTC ...and hot on its heels, one of my jobs has been returned too! Let's let this run over the weekend and then I'll see what I can report back on the results (unfortunately I may have to get Collaboration approval for every little result I release to the world. :-( ) ID: 580 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Crystal Pellet Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 13 Feb 15 Posts: 1188 Credit: 861,475 RAC: 2	Message 651 - Posted: 18 Aug 2015, 9:51:23 UTC You can have more results ... ... when you give us more jobs ;) Out of work again? ID: 651 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Yeti Send message Joined: 29 May 15 Posts: 147 Credit: 2,842,484 RAC: 0	Message 654 - Posted: 18 Aug 2015, 11:51:31 UTC - in response to Message 651. Out of work again? It seems so, my Clients are dry ID: 654 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

ivan Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 20 Jan 15 Posts: 1139 Credit: 8,310,612 RAC: 728	Message 656 - Posted: 18 Aug 2015, 12:48:21 UTC - in response to Message 654. Out of work again? It seems so, my Clients are dry Another 2000 jobs to the queue... ID: 656 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Crystal Pellet Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 13 Feb 15 Posts: 1188 Credit: 861,475 RAC: 2	Message 840 - Posted: 25 Aug 2015, 16:42:42 UTC Hi Ivan, The very new jobs today are surely different. Hopefully the results satisfies you. From the 1st cmsRun some remarks that maybe need your attention: At the start: cmsRun -j FrameworkJobReport.xml PSet.py %MSG-e Specific: OscarProducer:g4SimHits@beginRun 25-Aug-2015 18:01:52 CEST Run: 1 Could not process q-name of a DDLogicalPart, reason: No regex-match for namespace= name=HFFibre.* SpecPar selection is: //HFFibre.* %MSG and just before and when starting the 1st event: Reading SANC input files. File 'table1-1.txt' missing... skipped. File 'table2-2.txt' missing... skipped. File 'table11-11.txt' missing... skipped. Begin processing the 1st record. Run 1, Event 41, LumiSection 9 at 25-Aug-2015 18:15:36.415 CEST G4Fragment::CalculateExcitationEnergy(): WARNING Fragment: A = 26, Z = 12, U = -4.699e-01 MeV IsStable= 1 P = (-1.718e+00,1.596e+02,-1.577e+01) MeV E = 2.420e+04 MeV ID: 840 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

ivan Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 20 Jan 15 Posts: 1139 Credit: 8,310,612 RAC: 728	Message 845 - Posted: 25 Aug 2015, 20:21:51 UTC - in response to Message 840. Tja, this is a more speculative simulation (see longer explanation elsewhere). The first item is "normal", the second is not unexpected. This is a very experimental simulation and not all subdetectors have got their code fully updated to match the 2025 geometry. The part I'm interested in (the silicon tracker) is very well simulated in this code, to the best of my knowledge. ID: 845 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Development for LHC@home