Message boards : General Discussion : Docker instead VirtualBox?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
boboviz

Send message
Joined: 24 Oct 19
Posts: 195
Credit: 551,737
RAC: 367
Message 8461 - Posted: 4 Jun 2024, 14:57:41 UTC

From the last Boinc Workshop, David Anderson presentation:

Future
● Run apps in Docker natively (no VBox)
○ Detect Docker in client, use a wrapper
○ Move boinc2docker into BOINC
○ Windows: conflict with VBox :-(
ID: 8461 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
boboviz

Send message
Joined: 24 Oct 19
Posts: 195
Credit: 551,737
RAC: 367
Message 8505 - Posted: 11 Nov 2024, 10:09:10 UTC - in response to Message 8461.  

Seems that, with version 9 of the client (beta will be, probably, avaiable at December) we will have a first version of Docker support.

Are LHC admins working on it?
ID: 8505 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
boboviz

Send message
Joined: 24 Oct 19
Posts: 195
Credit: 551,737
RAC: 367
Message 8507 - Posted: 25 Nov 2024, 14:21:56 UTC

Meantime, the boinc admins released a new version of boinc vbox wrapper: release notes
ID: 8507 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
boboviz

Send message
Joined: 24 Oct 19
Posts: 195
Credit: 551,737
RAC: 367
Message 8695 - Posted: 10 Apr 2025, 9:33:19 UTC

A comment from Boinc developers..
We want to deprecate VBox functionality in future.
ID: 8695 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
computezrmle
Volunteer moderator
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Help desk expert
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Jul 16
Posts: 511
Credit: 400,710
RAC: 140
Message 8696 - Posted: 10 Apr 2025, 13:41:28 UTC - in response to Message 8695.  

In reply to boboviz's message of 10 Apr 2025:
A comment from Boinc developers..
We want to deprecate VBox functionality in future.

I guess you refer to this comment:
https://github.com/BOINC/boinc/issues/6134#issuecomment-2740452125

If so you may have also noticed this:
Wait for a couple of releases for feedback, and remove this functionality completely together with VBox support (will take a couple of years for that until all the projects that use VBox now switch to WSL/Docker).

At least for now (in relation to LHC@home)
- docker apps are under heavy development and not even released on prod
- snapshots are not yet implemented/tested
- there is no long term experience; maybe there are currently unknown pitfalls
ID: 8696 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
boboviz

Send message
Joined: 24 Oct 19
Posts: 195
Credit: 551,737
RAC: 367
Message 8697 - Posted: 10 Apr 2025, 13:52:39 UTC - in response to Message 8696.  

In reply to computezrmle's message of 10 Apr 2025:
If so you may have also noticed this:
[quote]Wait for a couple of releases for feedback, and remove this functionality completely together with VBox support (will take a couple of years for that until all the projects that use VBox now switch to WSL/Docker).


I noticed, i noticed. Indeed they do not say "near future", but it's an big switch and it's important to do things well..


At least for now (in relation to LHC@home)
- docker apps are under heavy development and not even released on prod
- snapshots are not yet implemented/tested
- there is no long term experience; maybe there are currently unknown pitfalls


The second point is important (IMHO)
ID: 8697 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : General Discussion : Docker instead VirtualBox?


©2025 CERN